No. 18-9114
Nolan George v. Noah Nagy, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-commitment contract-law due-process equal-protection fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment legal-promise plea-bargaining prosecutorial-discretion statute-of-limitations
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment
DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is it a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to ignore, alter or reinterpret commitments not to charge or prosecute individuals over time?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED FOR REVIEW IS IY A VIOLATION OF THE FIFTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION FOR STATE OR FEDERAL COURTS AND PROSECUTORS TO IGNORE, ALTER OR REINTERPRET COMMITMENTS NOT TO CHARGE OR PROSECUTE INDIVIDUALS OVER THE PASSING OF TIME, DEATH OR ABSENCE OF THOSE WHO ORIGINALLY OFFERED AND CONVEYED THE PROMISE AND COMMITMENT? !
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-05
Waiver of right of respondent Noah Nagy to respond filed.
2019-03-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2019)
Attorneys
Noah Nagy
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent