Whether the Full Faith & Credit Clause, Double Jeopardy Clause prohibits the State of Texas from re-prosecuting & re-imprisoning petitioner for an expired Illinois conviction

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED #5 WHETHER THE FULL,FATTH ¢ CREDIT Clause, ¢ DOUBUE JEOPARDY CLAUSE PROUIBIRS THE STRIE OF RXAS FROP] HEPROSERUTIG § REDOPRIZOSIOG PETETLOWER FOR Ad) EXPIRE 4S V8 OLD STATE OF LULNOES ConECIZON THROUGH ITS 59577 OF PAROLE pe ( Téxas gravted Fetstiowee parle for possess, of <ls of cocame, Yrtuhs later sf was supercecled by waposed) Conds hows br ae Seperedd asyr old Shte of Diwors sex ofhase) #2; DID PIORBTSEV “BREWER, 108 US. U(12) EXPRESSLY TPIPLY THAT Zi A PAROLE REVOCATION) HERBIG, THE CHARCTAG PO. (UNEEE : APPOTITED 70 ASSEST THE PAROLE Tal THETR DEFERSE PP ( Charqig parole. officer was appowted) duty to asses? Rhtoner obtain reguestedl medical documert a5 mtrvigaveog evidence for removal of elecdowe Moa vor fou Ais swollea keg & Ars har) . #3: Dd THE CUSTODY £ CONTAOL OF A STATE SPsT2™ OF PAROLE TAUOLUE STGMIFICANT RESTRAINT 10 ENTIMLE A AOROLEE A LIBERTY INTEREST 70 THE PERTON OF PAROLE AS ERRNED CREDITS served 00 THE SEOTEOCE FREE FROP) RETROSPERTLVE FORFETTURE AS EXPOUAKEN GY THIS COURT TI CALDERY BULL, 3 Dall. 336(1793); JOWESY CUMMTOG HAM, STL WS.236('68); WERDER ¥ GRAHAM, 450 US.24(81)" MTILLERY FLORTDA, 482 U.5.423(87)" LIEV PIARTs, $14 U5.4Bs(92)ee ( Responder apply stele statute retrosperhvel, da pret caadv) chow covmitted before statute's eMeediwe dake do forfert pole credits pds revocahos that wereases serterce beyood what by penal esde is prescribed, and, anwoueed) by dal court) eR EEROESAS:’”~SI a ee = :