No. 18-9121
Jerry L. Gater v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process faretta-v-california jury-trial-guarantee nelson-v-colorado presumption-of-innocence pro-se right-to-counsel sentencing-factors voir-dire
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-05-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a defendant have a right to participate in voir dire when proceeding pro se?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. UNDER FARETTA v CALIFORNIA DOES A-DEFENDANT HAVE A: REGHT WHEN PROCEEDING PRO SE TO PARTICIPATE IN VOIR DIRE? II. DOES THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE PROHIBIT DISTRICT COURTS FROM TREATING SEPARATEUNCHARGED OFFENSES AS! SENTENCING FACTORS OR RELEVANT CONDUCT DURING SENTENCING UNDER NELSON v COLORADO, THE JURY TRIAL GUARANTEE, AND THE DUE PROCESS GUARANTEE? i ‘Me 4
Docket Entries
2019-06-03
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2019-05-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent