No. 18-9123
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: discretion due-process eighth-amendment miller-v-alabama sentencing de-novo-resentencing discretionary-sentencing eighth-amendment hallmark-features-of-youth juvenile-offenders juvenile-sentencing miller-factors miller-v-alabama proportionality
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
HabeasCorpus Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-06-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is de novo resentencing required where lengthy, fully determinate sentences, primarily based on the discretion of the trial court, were imposed on juvenile offenders without consideration of the 'hallmark features of youth' set forth by this Court in Miller v. Alabama (2012) 567 U.S. 460[132 S. Ct. 2455] (Miller)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Is de novo resentencing required where lengthy, fully determinate sentences, primarily based on the discretion of the trial court, were imposed on juvenile offenders without consideration of the “hallmark features of youth” set forth by this Court in Miller v. Alabama (2012) 567 U.S. 460[132 S. Ct. 2455] (Miller)? i
Docket Entries
2019-06-17
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2019.
2019-05-13
Waiver of right of respondent California, et al. to respond filed.
2019-04-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2019)
Attorneys
California, et al.
Jovan McClenton
Leslie Beth Ringold — Los Angeles County Public Defender, Petitioner
Leslie Beth Ringold — Los Angeles County Public Defender, Petitioner