Whether the denial of the petitioner's request for medical treatment violates his constitutional rights

No question identified. : | anit ee | aot _A Reh mradics| writrrthat the Some Hex Qyartiny Sunn-Co — — nl in feugeot defondatt dng ta my Friluce is Chat He medico] ___ileusdsats Croudeh bo defeatentd engines OR Suite ‘3 Tow Com the defendant’ ont lowie Cousl dany mt Satin of nay _matdical Sackck for Security Concer mbar thu ss fad loc Heie makion ad Qlibante Sod oe Pett of ny mdel eke | ma wnuiuual becade it cams (Sutin PySics| dochuce,vaby deg , | poh_aggly to the cfisal of Hadibl c Avedocdl ed gngaing miSled lad bas Qromanat dears of top C befor Wvackey og Sher th i —7 gis wks AY Pav 6 taet Caer ahs, ft tele loxfiuee Ys pdt, demas dong I TN Hoa cos NS priser Sys get tary wil maki oa Safe I. Bas Codteak Fabi gnijnadiaVomithy Shemed Qin contd | iy Wags hiy Ce} nek sige oe ths a NEN Nos com the Coattiitiss Car Nectmod sed PEG foc sl) | co Abs ASF proteus, T Ls ine tardicsl tein, Tom srscll ade Jeo ail na lsd “tees Weininn goig ke (1 Gee TS adhe Sa Cociictioes Se sradf | na A hss cya Se_mgty Queddeef oom TS vahsh ce Is} Teen a Ysha Wot lst fo do ov lel be sh BR pk ~ Weed) Tien Fi died ts codkicl Pad od rltsie Lalo Cs. DX vy bay > 6a