No. 18-9133
Abdul Karim Bangura v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fourth-circuit-review guilty-plea guilty-plea-withdrawal ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel obstruction-of-justice right-to-counsel sentencing-enhancement withdrawal
Key Terms:
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-05-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in denying the defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. THE 4 CIRCUIT ERRED WHEN IT DID NOT OVERTURN THE DISTRICT COURT’S DENIAL OF BANGURA’s MOTION TO WITHDRAW HIS GUILTY PLEA BECAUSE THE MOTION WAS FILED PRIOR TO SENTENCING FOR A “FAIR AND JUST” REASON. II. THE 4T! CIRCUIT ERRED IN NOT FINDING BANGURA’S TRIAL COUNSELS, INDEPENDENTLY, PROVIDED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL. Ill. THE 4T™ CIRCUIT BY NOT FINDING THAT THE DISTRICT COURT’S ADDING OF A 2-LEVEL ENHANCEMENT FOR OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE VIOLATED A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT. i
Docket Entries
2019-06-03
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2019-05-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2019)
Attorneys
Abdul Karim Bangura Jr
Rebecca Sue Colaw — Rebecca S. Colaw P.C., Petitioner
Rebecca Sue Colaw — Rebecca S. Colaw P.C., Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent