Was the petitioner's original complaint properly dismissed as frivolous and without issuance and service of process?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : : %. ~ 2 (A) was “A wok% ERRoR: FoR Umbed State distarch Counks macsteate: dismissed palyeow ORtaiwal Com laint: RS, FRlolous -awdWithout iSSuance And SERVICE Fatwac, Seave ahh? QM paatic Listed bvext pages OFs ORfgiwal Complaint, Urs dista'ct Court Magiseates Sudgc deemed (AY “ates poksuAst to a8. usc a) ie VS-_ Undid ale Arokacck Court 1.9. WIS ¢ O\ yew SO144S SFA. Appcak 18-6154 _— @ paNonear has dispute Since Alo’ thous h * Us Aisiatich Couats of Columbia S.C 0.9.¢, . Us Stale Counis of Appeals of fourth CReuit Thing 5 Was No GRawd sons Convene Augy st » 00's Fok ® +Ruc bitte Stal One ctmen aos) 63 * MuBdAcR. Sc. Code Awwg IL4-0. To RzgutegV Olen aX, — . E ManSlavatheR Sic Code Ade IL-7 SO, hed qRéeater OF Fen 9é oF MvAders Was Never Fousdzd 3 by Lave Rand WRW it tems: of Gewer Sesser IN haweaske Covuw Sih Tudicay Ciacit Coughs @ —hisc Court's Above has Contave. Contest: . | Unc published Opinions tat age not. blinding at © Part Is