Michael Ray Ingram v. Frank Clements, et al.
SocialSecurity Punishment
Whether dismissal of claims for injunctive relief requiring state officials to obey the Eighth Amendment pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 was error?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether dismissal of claims for injunctive relief requiring state officials | ‘to obey the Eighth Amendment pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 was error? 2. Whether dismissal of claims against Defendants, Clements (prison system director) and Falk,(prison warden), was error because letters to them established deliberate indifference pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983? 3. Whether dismissal of claims against Defendant Chapdelaine (associate warden), based on supervisory liability for deliberate: indifference, where he deemed grievances frivolous was error? 4. Whether the failure to make a determination of Qualified Immunity pursuant to Wilson v. Layne, 526 U.S. at 617 (1999) was error?