Whether the lower courts' failure/refusal to follow this Court's standard of review for pro se prisoner complaints under Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) as held in Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89 (2007) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009) requires exercise of this Court's supervisory power

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether the lower courts’ failure/refusal to follow this Court’s standard of review for pro se prisoner complaints under Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) as held in Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89 (2007) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009) requires exercise of this Court’s supervisory power. Page ii of vi : II. LIST OF ALL PARTIES A, Petitioner, Pro Se : _ 2. John P. Fletcher #81478 B.V.C.F. East 1-S-12 P.O. Box 2017 | Buena Vista, Colorado 81211 B. Respondents ; Inmate Bank, Controller, Rick Raemisch, Tanya Whitney, and Unknown Prison Officials. Cc. Counsel for All Respondents 3. Colorado Attorney General’s Office 1300 Broadway, 10th Floor Denver, Colorado 80203 . Ill.