No. 18-9147
Donald G. Flint v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: 5th-amendment 6th-amendment boykin-admonishments constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment guilty-plea judicial-precedent sixth-amendment supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Jurisdiction
HabeasCorpus Jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2019-12-13
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the federal district court's finding and the Fifth Circuit Court's finding contrary to the precedent of the Supreme Court, as well as a violation of the United States Constitution 5th and 6th Amendments?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) WAS THE FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT'S FINDING AND THE FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT'S FINDING CONTRARY TO THE PRECEDENT OF THE SUPREME COURT, AS WELL AS A VIOLATION OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION 5TH AND 6TH AMENDMENTS? ; 2) WAS PETITIONER'S GUILTY PLEA UNINTELLIGENTLY made when he wasn't PROPERLY ADMONISHED UNDER BOYKIN v. ALABAMA, 89 S.Ct. 1709 (1969). A SILENT RECORD SUPREME COURT PRECEDENT? . ; li
Docket Entries
2019-12-16
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-11-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2019.
2019-10-28
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2016-04-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 5, 2019)