Whether the Honorable Margaret Mahoney should have issued a court order for the pro se litigant to reply to the defendant's motion to dismiss, as a minimal level of due process

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ——L. Whether ov not the. Henoveble Masgawet Maho Should had. tssued a. Cowt Order to Pla /Appcllont, pursue, Awzena. Rules of Cvil Procedure ) Rule 7, to reply +0 Definclant /Appellee’s Mahon +o DisMiS$, a5 Q, Minimal level oF due process, required fox the. ProSe litigant, bere Signing, a8 the. Mawvicopa. County Supertor Cout ? 2 Whether ov not Jy e Mahoney, Committed a veveverble, Ly ) ervey) When She, oie ig oo tered in favor of Defendaut Judge , ere Pursuant 4o Rule 51 Cb), when there were only the. Defer a and the. PlawlifP as Pavhes in the Case? 3. Whether ov not, Judge Mahoney, ached. in excess of her Tuisdic— . fe And. ebuse eR discvetion by vecewing Onl. Signing @ prett Exhibit A, of the Defendant's Reposed Tuclgment of Oct 25 2OIT, 28 Order Signed. on, Nov (3 2017?