No. 18-9152
IFP
Tags: aedpa constitutional-claims constitutional-question eighth-amendment federal-habeas federal-habeas-review federal-review habeas-corpus judicial-interpretation legal-precedent merits-decision state-court state-court-decisions supreme-court-review
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
HabeasCorpus Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Florida Supreme Court erred in treating Virginia v. LeBlanc, 137 S. Ct. 1726 (2017), as a decision on the merits of the underlying constitutional question
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Florida Supreme Court erred in treating Virginia v. LeBlanc, 137 S. Ct. 1726 (2017), a case arising under federal habeas review, as a decision on the merits of the underlying constitutional question. i
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-05-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 5, 2019)
2019-04-02
Application (18A1003) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until May 3, 2019.
2019-03-22
Application (18A1003) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 3, 2019 to May 3, 2019, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Gary Reid