Whether the circuit court erred in failing to correct a defective jury instruction

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Crrertep Caettal Exe) e Whe & piisciple o& LAW is WAATE RALLY VITAL TO A DEFERDAWT 1 A Céiminel CASE & TRIAL CoMLT EAN WUT MEK ELY Reruse A pérécn ve insreuctien , Bur mast Coek ET ; THE IWSTRUCTION Awd GIVE IT Ww THE Moree foam, (citer in) “Wiurey vCommeaurenl th, 24 va. 753 (6473) Aeo IW “ FishBack v. Commantwes th” 2e6 VA, (04 (2 +00). © [ue FiRsT Qu€stted IN MY CASE (S OT WHEATHER THE ci€cait eouRT Faccep TO Coekem & DEFECTIVE INSTEUCTION , INSTEAD You MUST PECLOE WHEATIEK THE Couers AWS WEI Te THE Jueloks Question wks iw FACT DEFECTIVE AND INACCURATE ? eo lhe secomm Question IS How ME Jueys QuUESTioN SHokLp HAVE BEEN ANSWELED 50 THAT THE Jury Coup BE PeopGdly INFORMED RD CouLD PEADEL 4 Fae TRIAL (0 BoTl CAETIES WHILE PRESERVING THE SEPARATION oF THE JUDICIAL BeAnCHS Function OF ASSESSIN 4 funris me at pap THE EXECUTIVE Brancds Function of Anminisrehiy Tye Punish mtat. ° Merce THE CASE WAS SubmiTIEo Te THE Jaey Fel SEATENCING PELIBERATIONS THE . ca . TUeyY KSKED THE Fetlowing uestin ¢ Uk What To ko BXACTEY; WiATS THE Tem Fok ure sentence, THe Deeinmiod oF Lice Imphisoamat mw TERMS OF ysacs? ¢ a e \e A Surge (S NoT PERMMMTED To go INTO How A LIPE SENTENCE (5 CALCULATED, THe Why . “ °? T ou CALL IS HE of SHE PERMITIED TO INSTRUCT THE Suey THAT “LiFe means Lire [lis 'S WHAT | A poate STANDALD, SOMETHING THAT US applep UNEQUALLY,