Did the Third Circuit Court of Appeals use the wrong legal standard; in conflict with the precedents of The Supreme Court and the Other Courts of Appeals on the federal question that the standard for recusal is demanded when potential for bias too high to be constitutionally tolerable?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW: , 1. Did the Third Circuit Court of Appeals use the wrong legal standard; in conflict with the precedents of The Supreme Court and the Other Courts of Appeals on the federal question that the standard for recusal is demanded when potential for bias too high to be constitutionally tolerable? ; 2. Did the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in conflict with The Supreme Court and the Other Courts of Appeals precedents, fail to follow the laws and rules of the judiciary in condoning a proscribed procedure of one of the courts it is mandated to supervise in violation of 28 U.S.C. @ 455(a) and Canon 3(A)(4) forbidding judges from initiating exparte proceedings on an impending matter absent written consent violation Rule 43 (a) and violated the concept of fair notice applies equally to the judiciary? 2 ¥ , \ ,