No. 18-9171

John Priestley, Jr. v. Two Houses, in Buckeye, Maricopa County, Arizona, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 18-usc-1962 beneficiary campaign-misconduct electronic-communication estate estate-property fiduciary fiduciary-duty judicial-immunity racketeering-statute rent rent-collection rental-contract violation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is a fiduciary's collection of rent from a beneficiary at approximately one hundred times the rental value of an estate's property a violation of 18 U.S. Code § 1962 (b) if there is no valid rental contract in place to do such a thing?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED (Condensed) Is a fiduciary’s collection of rent from a beneficiary at approximately one hundred times the rental value of an estate’s property a violation of 18 U.S. Code § 1962 (b) if there is no valid rental contract in place to do such a thing? Does Judicial Immunity apply to the activities of misrepresentations in an illegal partisan campaign involving electronic delivery of a Statement of Organization through interstate electronic servers, thousands of illegal partisan mailings, and chicanery in compliance with multiple reprimands from a Judicial Election Commission? Has the Judge in the above situation contributed or participated in behavior in such a way that he has contributed to contemptuous behavior? Should this Judge who made political bias part of his campaign in violation of state statute recuse himself if asked?

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2018-12-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 6, 2019)

Attorneys

John Priestley, Jr.
John Priestley — Petitioner
John Priestley — Petitioner