Robert Murphy v. Ron Neal, Superintendent, Indiana State Prison
DueProcess CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus
Whether the government's warrantless search of a person's cell phone violates the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . 1) Whether Murphy’s Fifth, Sixth, Fourteenth Amendment rights and his Miranda were violated. . | 2) Whether the court of Appeals violated Murphy’s due process by denying him the right to complete the record. 3) Whether Appellate counsel Performance violated Appellarit’s Sixth and Fourteenth : Amendments, when counsel refuse to remove himself. . : 4) Whether the state committed a Brady violation, when the state failed to turn over Exculpatory material Evidence. . 5) Whether the State committed Prosecutor Misconduct when state failed to correct false : testimony which violated Murphy due process and right to a fair trial. . 6) Whether Appellant Murphy’s Six and Fourteenth Amendment was violated when , Appellate Counsel failed to Raise Eyewitness account. 7) Whether the Trial and Appellate Counsel were ineffective for failing to raise and Investigate the D.N.A that was never found, and the unknown D.N.A. that was found. ; 8) Whether Appellant Murphy’s Sixth Amendment was violated when his was not inform of the true nature of the charges. : 9) Whether Trial Counsel and Appellate Counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate ‘the mental history of the states witness and object to the testimony at Trial, And raise on direct appeal. :