No. 18-9180

Cesar Arce-Hernandez v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal-waiver criminal-justice-act criminal-procedure garza-v-idaho indigent-defendant ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-agreement plea-bargaining pretrial-proceedings right-to-counsel sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-06-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a Sixth Amendment claim of ineffectiveness of assistance of counsel during pretrial proceedings survive a general waiver of the right to appeal in a plea agreement?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I Does a Sixth Amendment claim of ineffectiveness of assistance of counsel during pretrial proceedings survive a general waiver of the right to appeal in a plea agreement? Il. Does an indigent defendant have a constitutional or statutory right to continuity of previously appointed counsel absent a finding of “interests of justice” as required under the Criminal Justice Act? 2. 3

Docket Entries

2019-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2019.
2019-05-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 6, 2019)

Attorneys

Cesar Arce-Hernandez
Atmore L Baggot — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent