Whether reasonable jurists could debate whether Sessions v. Dimaya and Johnson v United States invalidated the residual clause in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(B)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I, Whether reasonable jurists could debate whether Sessions v. Dimaya 188 S. Ct. 1204 (2018) and Johnson v United States, 135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015) invalidated the residual clause in 18 U.S.C. § 924(¢)(3)(B) IL. Whether the residual of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(8)(B) is unconstitutionally void for vagueness for the same reasons that this Court found 18 U.S.C. § 16(b) void vagueness in Dimaya i INTERESTED PARTIES There are no