No. 18-9200

Andrew Cox v. United States

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: change-of-venue civil-procedure civil-rights docket-manipulation due-process fifth-amendment fraud judicial-misconduct malicious-prosecution obstruction-of-justice standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-06-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Fifth Amendment demand immediate correction of a fraudulently manipulated district court docket (arrest post-dated 35 days) used to per se maliciously prosecute an actually innocent American citizen?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions Presented DATE: 04/01/2019 04:51:26 PM . . QUESTIONS PRESENTED |. Does the Fifth Amendment demand immediate correction of a fraudulently manipulated district court docket (arrest post-dated 35 days) used to per se maliciously prosecute an actually innocent American citizen? Il. ls Petitioner legally entitled to a change of venue because his case criminally implicates both District of New Jersey (now Chief) USDJ Jose L. Linares and (now) Third Circuit Judge Patty Shwartz with fraud and felony obstruction of justice? lll. Alternatively to II, is Petitioner entitled to disqualification of (1) USDJ Claire C. Cecchi for presumed bias, and (2) DNJ AUSA Shana W. Chen for perpetuating the fraudulent manipulation of his district court docket to post-date his arrest 35 days?

Docket Entries

2019-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2019.
2019-05-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 7, 2019)

Attorneys

Andrew Cox
Andrew Cox — Petitioner
Andrew Cox — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent