No. 18-9208

Robert Tringham v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights core-judicial-functions court-of-appeals due-process habeas judicial-delegation judicial-functions non-judicial-officer procedural-authority remand rule-12.1' 'Does the Court hold that pursuant to rule-22b2 rule-60b6 rule-60b6' 'Does FRAP 12.1 grant a Circuit Court standing
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-06-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Under what circumstances does access to the courts not mean access to justice

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Question 1. Under what circumstances does access to the courts not mean access to justice. Question 2. Does FRAP 12.1 grant a Circuit Court of Appeals the authority to delegate its core judicial functions to a non judicial officer. Question 3. Does the Court hold that pursuant to Rule 22(b)(2), a notice of : appeal can only be construed as an application for a COA, in a habeas context, not in Rule 60(b)(6), where the only issue is . whether the district court complied with the Court of Appeals order of remand. -ii-e

Docket Entries

2019-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2019.
2019-05-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 10, 2019)

Attorneys

Robert Tringham
Robert Tringham — Petitioner
Robert Tringham — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent