No. 18-9235
Richard McMillan, III v. Florida
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure criminal-procedure due-process evidence inconsistent-evidence inconsistent-testimony judicial-discretion motion-for-acquittal motion-for-judgment-of-acquittal petitioner-defense state-evidence trial trial-court trial-court-evidence
Key Terms:
DueProcess Jurisdiction
DueProcess Jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can the Trial Court forbid Submission of Evidence at trial that supports Petitioner's Defense, when in fact, there's a dispute?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED As to ISSUE I of this application, QUESTION # 1: Can the Trial Court forbid Submission of Evidence at tria] that supports Petitioner's Defense, when in fact, there’s a dispute? As to ISSUE II of this application, . QUESTION # 9: Should a Motion for Judgment of Acquittal be granted, when the . State’s Evidence is inconsistent with the information and inconsistent between testimony and physical evidence at trial?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-10
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2019-05-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 10, 2019)