No. 18-9246

Anthony G. Bryant v. Department of Education, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: administrative-procedure asset-seizure civil-forfeiture civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process eighth-amendment equal-protection excessive-fines first-amendment fourteenth-amendment tenth-amendment
Key Terms:
Environmental DueProcess FirstAmendment FourthAmendment Punishment
Latest Conference: 2019-11-15 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on excessive fines applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions Presented Petitioner cites Errors by US Court of Appeals for the Fourth District clear of Eighth Amendment regarding excessive fines Tyson Timbs v State of Indiana is clear regarding Occurrence and Bad Faith by local and state government and abuse of the Tenth Amendment. Fourteenth Amendment provides for Equal Protection and Due Process without any money after asset seizure how can any person file necessary fees to proceed within any local , state, and federal court. Petitioner made public comment under Administrative Procedure Act of 1946 Notice, Procedure, Effective Date Asset Seizure undermined : Petitioners ability to Redress under the First Amendment and denied Right to Vote and qualified assembly under DEA, FBI, Homeland Security and other federal components with no “ Social Media” component within the Justice Department under Fourth Amendment person , house, papers and effects denying by default Sixth Amendment protections and criminal discovery abuse operating in bad faith ; even qualifying religion and rights to vote US v Cruikshank and US v Reese.

Docket Entries

2019-11-18
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-10-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-10-11
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 13, 2019)

Attorneys

Anthony G. Bryant
Anthony G. Bryant — Petitioner
Anthony G. Bryant — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent