No. 18-925

A-1 Premium Acceptance, Inc. v. Meeka Hunter

Lower Court: Missouri
Docketed: 2019-01-16
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: arbitration-agreement arbitrator civil-procedure contract contract-law contract-validity dispute-resolution due-process federal-arbitration-act integral-term judicial-review section-5 statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration ClassAction
Latest Conference: 2019-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a statement in an arbitration agreement that a specific arbitrator is to be utilized is an integral term that prohibits application of §5 of the Federal Arbitration Act if the named arbitrator is not available, thus invalidating the arbitration agreement as a whole

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question Presented for Review Whether a statement in an arbitration agreement that a specific arbitrator is to be utilized is an integral term that prohibits application of §5 of the Federal Arbitration Act ifthe named arbitrator is not available, thus invalidating the arbitration agreement as a whole. ii Parties to This Proceeding and

Docket Entries

2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-01-23
Waiver of right of respondent Meeka Hunter to respond filed.
2019-01-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 15, 2019)

Attorneys

A-1 Premium Acceptance, Inc.
Mark D. MurphyThe Murphy Law Firm, Petitioner
Mark D. MurphyThe Murphy Law Firm, Petitioner
Meeka Hunter
F. Paul Bland Jr.Public Justice, Respondent
F. Paul Bland Jr.Public Justice, Respondent