Willie James Atkins v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Jurisdiction
Does the Doctrine of 'Equitable Tolling' due to claims of 'Fraudulent Concealment' of obviously important facts, extend to AEDPA legislative cases?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. QUESTION: Does the Doctrine of ‘Equitable Tolling’ due to claims of "FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT' of obviously important facts, extend to AEDPA legislative cases, if the lower court lliikewise, cliited and sought guidance tin other NON-AEDPA Legislative cases-? 2.. QUESTION: Does Suits in Admirality Act (SAA) Legislation extended by the Fifth Circuit into AEDPA case law, used as guidance to the questiton of ‘EQUITABLE TOLLING', justify Atkins attempt to extend FTCA Legislation as "MATERIALLY 3. QUESTION: Does SAA Legislatllon regarding ‘DISCOVERY RULE' extend to Atkins. case on a set of MATERIALLY INDISTINGUISHABLE facts-? 4. QUESTION: Should the argument for RARE and EXCEPTIONAL cl!rcumstances claimed in BUCK v. DAVIS, 137 S.Ct. 759 (2017), extend to the INSTANT CASE on a set of MATERIALLY INDISTINGUISHABLE FACTS. 5. QUESTION: Was trial counsel's decllsion not to investilgate claims of non-transmission; impoach detcct!!ve durllng suppression hearing; cross examine and impeach in jury's presence REASONABLE professional standards, resultilng in prejudice. q ov