No. 18-9256
Zeeshan Khalid Syed v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: affidavit certificate-of-appealability civil-procedure civil-rights counsel-affidavit court-discretion due-process evidentiary-hearing habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel pro-se reasonableness-of-counsel standing waiver waiver-doctrine writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-06-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When a pro-se files for a COA and discusses his claim extensively in his argument, can the Court construe the issue as being waived?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Ql. When a-pro-se files for a COA and discuss his claim , extensively in his argument, can the Court construe the issue as being waived? . Q2. When the Gourt evaluating the reasonableness of the counsel, can they rely completely on a counsel's : ; affidavit with out considering other reference of : evidence that Movant provides without calling for an evidential hearing? . : (ii)
Docket Entries
2019-06-17
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2019.
2019-05-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 14, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent