Whether the lower court(s) erred in its interpretation as to the 'vagueness challenge' of Section §924(c)(3)(B), and the meaning as to what is considered a crime of violence and the 'use, attempted use, or threatened use of force against another person

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED "Whether the lower court(s) erred in its interpretation as to the "vagueness challenge" of Section §924(c)(3)(B), and the meaning as to what is considered a crime of violence and the "use, attempted use, or threatened use of . force against another person." 2). : "Whether the court violated the petitioner's Constitutional right under the the Fifth Amendment right to "Due Process" concerning the misapplication of §924(c)(3)(B). 3). , “Whether the lower court violated the petitioner's "Double Jeopardy" rights by his being charged in a multiple type indictment by both the charge of §2119 "Carjacking" and §924(c)}(3)(B) “Use of a firearm during the commission of a violent crime." ; ;