Whether the counsel's failure to cross-examine the main witness Beatrice Lawrence constituted ineffective assistance of counsel

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . jh . ‘TweFFeclive Assistance OF Cousel ig A 6’ Amewdfen] A.WHY Tha Coumsel CARL A. BeckSIEDI IIL did Not cRoss EXAMivE Thee Main Wituess BEAMRice LAWRENCE. WHEN TRiAL CouwseL Kiew JHAtAss ClrenT Pay Burke Have THe RighT To bE CowFRowled With Te Witwessess AGAwsT Him P NicoloudaKis V.AbRohams a4b Fed, APPX, 5032008 ULeS> APP. LEXis aig45 CHAubers VeMissiBBiPP'CHio WS .284L1973], And United STatesV, BAGIEY C473 U.S. 667 935] SEE MarYland ¥. CRAIG 497 U.S, 8368 45.116 S.Ct 31ST ML, Ed, dol bbb (1990) TAYLoRV MetoYer 788 S.E.dd 3°76 (2016) And Hiegins Ve Rew; cos4?0 F.3d 624 630-434 CH CiRe d00b) QiWAY TRAL CouwseL Failed To ObdecT To JarY WsTtuct ag Which sited To View dikecT aud CikcumsTantial Evidence As The Sane. BY TRial. CourT who Further Slated That the Law Makes Mo distivction Befueed The Two? REAGAN Ve MORRIS9385 F.3d 6161693 (8™ CiR. 2004) S.WHY TRial Couwsel. Failed To Call and PresenT Factual Witwess The Medical’ Exaniver” Miche DuPre Hose. TestiMosY is PeoFEssioaal Aud EXPERT To RebuttThe Pao seculfoas AlReadY Weak Case. Covel VHolLivss961 F.3d 2/0 ,2/7-19 (2" CiR: 2001) SAVER Holhulsywbl F342) ,2I7-/8(a"" Ci, Qout) TeWitY Theat Cunsel Failed To bain ip he Juanes Aifeatiny That The ofp Fenchn]” A Was AcQuitted OF The CHarGe OF Possession OFA LikeAe duiine 7 Commissow OF A CriMe OF Violence .u,S, V, HACKEE ) 506 F.8d 295593) Chenin, ins EAMES OO ENT 8S ISIS Cie Q007) SWAY TRAL Counsel Failed Ta bRIWG To The. Jurors Attention That Accondive To the Bye Wires Brace LAwReuce’s SAT Men oF Spee Kand¥ Burke Sifoo7 A Gun iN The AikyAnd Mo (CT M WAS MoT Aw inTentional. Act oF Hh RaTher I“ deGhee Murdor OR Man slauGHTeR . ° wader Bur Richie Ve WorKHanr594 F.3d 1131 5138-41 Co™ CR Q0)) CE ee MM an yort Fed 3198-11 C/0* CR Qold) . .