Whether the lower court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims

No question identified. : OUT Pe [pei omer omy! me sme cpe emp grabs bal og a Leer ertig earn) PO MEST IO rage wr 70 Ww hubs ospg LPO OTE PP TP ip 20 0 betas you pemyeapun Typ by Crpngcmg | BOYS PILI m0 ep om pm ay HEEL Cope Is 0 Fp gop cormuy bas bu spo vou ws aac xy AOKI OFM “ET vormoy “ IVER IBD, Hy vai brow 2 fr” ay Pap gop may Ty Oe npe as2 har ve wagsbigsanus ay Opay of epic 4s ey iy) Me EPP TS Gerprvtaseoey wo geen spree ey. bay benny pers any POH OG CPRM 2 AGH! POM YLT “bh 6° Sperry Sey) at wvugr. OS Sc 7 ? nee ROMP ITEY Bose. pratngrinsy. son “ag srity ee pareeh vo ap ISay (rypsibar Frc ape wwe ssw Sowoys hooey wey Commu poo rg rel PY (easy he ap pence 2 0 exo ny Oe To SRD worey 32 wacby ypenbror? crys “seers ycon buoy byenay vein i JO B/prmeg varey 1G 9 ve Epson buiamriay (sve poets Brpory ceyveneng TM F170 €s wry ydound TH Ym op y bonyprrvn ny you S00 pan “opp iaucs wove fw twru sexe ¥ Araysry peed ssvdl fis pem ay ff smoys 29097 fw vo MONSON SapUT Opraasovey ny ‘Frrncig fw am CEU NG ‘ & POE voreayp Nan UPI PYP SIN SPRY fw Jo Spuoz7s pinot OF yapecad poy Pinan Promen Ow fi eeyyer fore fro Pump pay sm Fw pinomm scryMapsengg Ga.LN3Saud (S)NOILSAND