Carole L. Scheib v. James Rozberil
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Whether an appellate court must apply established state rules and laws pertaining to real-property, statute-of-limitations, due-process, but continue to violate civil-rights
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. | Whether in reviewing a rightful claim, an appellate court must apply and follow their own established State rules and laws pertaining to real property, their own established statute of limitations, timely due process actions, but; to continue to violate this petitioners US. Civil Rights and Liberties to due process? The original cause of action must arise under federal law, for a federal court to have jurisdiction under federal question. (Original cause of action of foreclosure NO notice.) II. For No hearing, a ex-parte hearing an Order on her own accord, ignoring the facts, and laws; timely presented in The Court of Common Pleas, also, the Superior Court and the Supreme Court of Western PA. Since this case involves real property are this petitioner’s due process rights violating the fifth and fourteenth amendments?