No. 18-9287

Carole L. Scheib v. James Rozberil

Lower Court: Pennsylvania
Docketed: 2019-05-16
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process ex-parte federal-question fifth-amendment foreclosure property-law real-property statute-of-limitations
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether an appellate court must apply established state rules and laws pertaining to real-property, statute-of-limitations, due-process, but continue to violate civil-rights

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. | Whether in reviewing a rightful claim, an appellate court must apply and follow their own established State rules and laws pertaining to real property, their own established statute of limitations, timely due process actions, but; to continue to violate this petitioners US. Civil Rights and Liberties to due process? The original cause of action must arise under federal law, for a federal court to have jurisdiction under federal question. (Original cause of action of foreclosure NO notice.) II. For No hearing, a ex-parte hearing an Order on her own accord, ignoring the facts, and laws; timely presented in The Court of Common Pleas, also, the Superior Court and the Supreme Court of Western PA. Since this case involves real property are this petitioner’s due process rights violating the fifth and fourteenth amendments?

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
2019-07-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-03-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 17, 2019)

Attorneys

Carole L. Scheib
Carole L. Scheib — Petitioner
Carole L. Scheib — Petitioner