No. 18-9290

Albert J. Hamilton v. Jurban, RN, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: amendment-interpretation civil-rights constitutional-conflict criminal-law disability due-process equal-protection legal-classification rational-basis sentencing standing state-interest takings
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the State of California create a conflict under the U.S. Const. 5th and 14th Amend. by not providing a rational relationship between a legitimate state interest and classifying a (CPC) illegal conviction?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : : ' rd U.S. SuPreme Court Rule 14. , |. Dogs THe STATE OF calrforuta CREATE A tou Fleer UNDER THE US. CONST. —Sth-And tH Hy Amend: By hat Prove TOtNG A ReTrowal ReELATCOUSHeP Between A Leerte mate STaTé DuTEREST Aud éLassrfysue A Coen /He ClLegar . CTR) INTEeeTron 2 2. Does THe STaTe of ¢alrforura CREATE A CouPleer UNDER THE Us. Const. Sth AnD LUdh Anmemo. By Mot Prov. TOrMG A ReTrouAL ReleTrousHrp ReTWeEen A LeecTx nati “orite ANTEREST Prup Classtfyrue A (Tp) Code #32, Tunantz From C1487), Betomrue a (ray Code #22, bimens Tu C2015) AT Che-Enst How Ts Wor B 0ea/He NethreENCE Matter ? 3. Does THe Stare of Calrfoanra Create R CouFlrer “UNDER THE Pew, Cove Hy. By Mor PRovrone A RaTrOMaL ReLatrou$Hrp ReTWeeu 7 LecaTr MATE Stang INTER ET | Auo éknssrfyurme THe CTRLUDMASTRWeES oF On& ConamETTING THe Peualty of Penivey MBER THE Lauus of Tie $Tate of Celforura. How a TH MoT Persvey 7 BY M. Trudillo on & Gate Docu men Cor /He 2 How 58 IT Nor PER suey By My hnoeessrog, Cdee] He Rin Copm~t) whey She Strom The Stare OdtunneuiT? Aud Wet Aa. WALLRee, Aloo Stow Tile STate BoeuMENT 7 ae YAS Ql MNFAPUL ID > aI M2 MB hous 499 yor ‘Aang JI7+3 a P0924 Ima paw THOU lau paagg | 1? FARING Yourny “AOPAS Y 470NAa of Pasngay ys “4say "NAS — rb ga vy “HE smut aay PAPAL) Srestay aprag Aur1e? savy MINISTID 40 'e0q 406 gupy ‘S107 '3 how tg | “ASUASLO Cm g "ELZ 4$ apog ™™d 0 voy huag? 3,Nayy PIE IID rY4 49 Aor TNE UP s0m A ay MMO OH oe qty YAU QL4 Ya , MS3INIy Uey Vavasauy FNAL IS INQ LSID sayy Tye any MAIR (vay> Wrezsagy IN2323y AL azuyg 0799 5°) 90 tan *Hiara7? arg "Sazary Aimsaussg TWITIBW WOH) “G9 yw +t Woy) Wy U2LYY arn 7H (wea 'L82zy “ddag +44 ‘Ub (Sbb) su ‘TMD ‘Kasyzm <a NEW AI9D Sry qesdaway ~ Oroulsmays a4) NF O2INEQ e027 AY qWweTasW su 2 SO3IAaN. 744 [wae ~ Ay a250333 Wo S2d Lin tiay farug Ang np raxtudrernig NGUW] v OYD muy OW 20042%9 ay ALF Uussg HLIM Shwe Wa" am MLO AWW TLIO 94 WI Al ANTAL ISH gry A9TUBINT BIMLO ay -3U PFHSNOD SY AuNedty YW ond NE ‘th FUEL NT asNayzy saWww (POLL225 ‘399 FLUIS Gat ‘7 ais 241 9209 *h OND LATING? W alNaUg YanA4yN e i . This tueludes all the sre) He~Shuff cb Bane that Geted onthe toler ob Stakehewe Mosiproe-te Pogse — Bur US. (47 L/49G)), . I, Doesthe State of daltfornia ereate w ton Flav. Urnider Hw US. 2omsh Sth Rud ith Rmeed. By not Proyidtuq a Robeoual Relatinushp Between Q heatti male Stébe interest cud dlascifymeg a 2pee/ Hy Megat rr) indeehions ? | , 2. Does the Stube of califormuia dreate og Conflict vuder inmates defined tu THe 42, Unithed Stutes Lode, Secdipas $4 /2I0L. By mot Providing 4 Radfowal Relyd— Aonship Beton 4 Leg) brute Stile fpr vst ond Classifying ~ ton! & CADAD tamale tuith Aisib/lihy, be Lveelided From fur bier pa byme Su any ~ Chee) Ged/r di es Or fetesyd anycase] He Needs ? . TABLE of CouTENrs . | U+S. SUPREME CoveT Rule IU. seen eee ee? OUvESTIous PRESENTED... a re TABLE of CONTETS. ee ee nee Cees ewer iit PeTsTrow For WRIT of CERTTonART, reef OPruroms Below... . a re wif ok , Page . . oneaew ome ew LL JURTSDICTOM «eee weve enon STaTEMEmp of THe ese... ll, 3 RRoeedvear HisTory. ea. “ete ee ee cg REAS0u5 for GRATING Tie WRIT. weeeae 4 MSO ee : | FUOeY To APPeupy ees APPENDTY APletition Uuten United State Dis teat Court The Easteny Olstrret of Califormre, Lase uo CLibevosut-qep)y Order To Dismissed ons March 22, 2Olu. Also ~See By hibit Cad, APPEMOIY ALUnited Shab Olstrtet epung The Edsteny Disteeet of Califerase COS Ny (2 ewasey7ReP)Order Th Dismiss ed OM APrIL 22, Zoi, Algo Sex Evhihs Cal), APPENDry Re SuPer tor Court of Coliferury in Oud for the County of San Luts obtspa, Case hep (SHe e040 2)Order denied Ou Septen, ber 2, 201g, RiSo bee Ex hy byt (2B), | A PPeupry ¢ Superior Lourt of California, toumyy df Solane, Depart mrad Awerty "ONE, Lus¢e pup F€232139%)edu deured ony June /% 20/0. 459 Sue Esthi' bsp cé) an . s bas APPeunax e1Sup verter Court of Hhe State of . Case MO. (FER 321347) order troucher bazk to | Supurtor bourt of dalifornie, Coun ty of Sim L

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2018-09-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 14, 2019)

Attorneys

Albert J. Hamilton
Albert J. Hamilton — Petitioner
Albert J. Hamilton — Petitioner