Whether the trial court erred and abused its discretion in denying Mr. Cooper's 3.850 (b) (1) Motion for Postconviction relief based on Newly Discovered Evidence, violating his Federal Constitutional Rights to Due Process

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether the trial court erred and abused its discretion in denying Mr. Cooper’s 3.850 (b) (1)Motion for Postconviction : relief based on Newly Discovered Evidence, violating his Federal Constitutional Rights to Due Process. 2. Whether the trial court erred and abused its discretion in denying Mr. Cooper an evidentiary hearing on his Motion for Postconviction relief based on Newly Discovered Evidence, violating his Federal Constitutional Rights to Due Process, where he did not receive a full and fair opportunity to present his claim. 3. Whether the trial court erred and abused its discretion in~ ; not appointing Mr. Cooper counsel to assist him in presenting his complex Newly Discovered Evidence claim, violating his Federal Constitutional Rights to Due Process, where he did not receive a full and fair opportunity to present his claim. © 4. Whether the Fourth District Court of Appeal erred and abused its discretion in denying Mr. Cooper’s complex Newly Discovered Evidence claim without holding an evidentiary hearing, : violating his Federal Constitutional Rights to Due Process, where he did not receive a full and fair opportunity to present his claim. 5. Whether the numerous Due Process Violations, individually and/or collectively, irreparably denied Mr. Cooper his right to a full and fair opportunity to present his complex Newly ‘ Discovered Evidence claim. \ eB,