No. 18-9299

Frankie Karen Washington v. Deborah Johnson, Warden

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review apprendi apprendi-v-new-jersey circuit-split constitutional-review harmless-error judicial-discretion sentencing sentencing-error sixth-amendment statutory-maximum
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Apprendi error at sentencing is harmless based on the entire record or only whether the sentence exceeded the statutory maximum

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Under Apprendi v. New Jersey 530 U.S. 466 (2000), it violates the Sixth Amendment to sentence a defendant to a higher statutory maximum term based on facts found by the sentencing court that were neither alleged in the indictment nor found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. The circuits are split on the standard for reviewing the harmlessness of Apprendi error at sentencing. The question presented is whether review is for whether the sentence was greater than authorized absent the error or whether review is of the entire record, as permitted for trial error, to determine whether the result would have been the same absent the error. i

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-04
Waiver of right of respondent Deborah Johnson to respond filed.
2019-05-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 17, 2019)

Attorneys

Deborah Johnson
Charles Shang-Rei LeeCalifornia Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Frankie Washington
Guy Michael TanakaLaw Office of Michael Tanaka, Petitioner