No. 18-9313
Warren D. Watson v. Matthew Killough, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-exhaustion administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights dismissal due-process exhaustion-of-remedies grievance-procedures handbook-interpretation prisoner-rights procedural-confusion
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-06-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
What is considered proper exhaustion and was there enough confusion in the policy handbook and other procedures to warrant non-exhaustion?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
LIST OF ALL PARTIES [ * ] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all
Docket Entries
2019-06-17
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2019.
2019-05-20
Waiver of right of respondent Matthew Killough, et al. to respond filed.
2019-05-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 17, 2019)
Attorneys
Matthew Killough, et al.
Andrew David Ringel — Hall & Evans, LLC, Respondent
Andrew David Ringel — Hall & Evans, LLC, Respondent