No. 18-9318
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment griffin-v-illinois indigent-appellant right-to-appeal standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for lack of standing and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted
Question Presented (from Petition)
No question identified. : QUESTIONIS] PRESENTED 1 WHETHER THE STATE COURTS REFUSAL TO PROVIDE INDIGENT APPELLANTS WITH A COMPLETE COPY OF THE RECORD/TRANSCRIPTS FROM ALL PRE CONVICTION PROCEEDINGS TO PERMIT PROPER CONSIDERATION OF (HIS) CLAIMS VIOLATES THE XIV AMENDMENT OF THE US CONSTITUTION AND THE HOLDING OF GRIFFIN V. ILLINOIS? Petitioner answers “yes” The State answers “no” i
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-13
Waiver of right of respondent Michigan to respond filed.
2019-05-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 17, 2019)
Attorneys
Michigan
Thomas Richard Grden — Oakland Co. Prosecutor's Off., Respondent
Thomas Richard Grden — Oakland Co. Prosecutor's Off., Respondent