No. 18-9322

Edward Ray Crosby v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: aggravated-robbery crime-of-violence criminal-law disability judicial-review senior-victim sentencing sentencing-guidelines stokeling-precedent stokeling-v-united-states united-states-sentencing-commission ussg-4b1.2
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Texas offense of aggravated robbery by inflicting injury against a senior or disabled victim satisfies the definition of 'crime of violence' found in USSG §4B1.2

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether, after Stokeling v. United States, U.S.__, 139 S.Ct. 544 (2019), the Texas offense of aggravated robbery by inflicting injury against a senior or disabled victim satisfies the definition of “crime of violence” found in USSG §4B1.2? Subsidiary question: whether there is a reasonable probability of relief if the court below were to reconsider its decision in this case in light of Stokeling? ii PARTIES Edward Ray Crosby is the Petitioner, who was the defendant-appellant below. The United States of America is the Respondent, who was the plaintiff-appellee below. ili

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-05-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 17, 2019)

Attorneys

Edward Ray Crosby
Kevin Joel PageOffice of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Kevin Joel PageOffice of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent