No. 18-9326

David Marshall v. Wisconsin

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction certificate-of-appealability civil-procedure constitutional-right constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus habeas-petition jurists-of-reason procedural-ruling seventh-circuit
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment DueProcess CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit erred in failing to issue a Certificate of Appealability

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . 1)Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit : Erred, when it failed to issue ae Certificate of Appealibility under title 28 U.S §1291, 2253(c), and Fed. 22(b). When the petitioner's made a substantial showing of a Constitutional Right as indicting by BAREFOOT V. ESTELLE, 463 U.S. 880, 893 (1983). 2)A4 jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the habeas petition states a valid claim of the denial of a Constitutional Right. 3)A jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling. “ wii,

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-05
Waiver of right of respondent Wisconsin to respond filed.
2018-10-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 17, 2019)

Attorneys

David Marshall
David Marshall — Petitioner
Wisconsin
Lisa E. F. KumferWisconsin Department of Justice, Respondent