No. 18-9333

Gustavo Gomez v. California

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appeal case-law constitutional-rights court-of-appeals criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus judicial-review jurisdiction motion-to-amend sixth-amendment standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Were this Petitioner's Sixth Amendment rights according to the United States Constitution violated by the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit Judge?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Were this Petitioner’s Sixth Amendment rights according to the United . States Constitution violated by the United States Court of Appeal for the , Ninth Circuit Judge? 2. Does Petitioner’s conviction and sentence violate the principles as cited in Gomez V. Madden, 2018 U. S. Dist. LEXIS 14992 (9 Cir. 2018) 3. The ruling in Jackson V. Barnes, 749 F. 3d 755 (9th Cir. 2018) allowed for... this Petitioner to certify this question of law to the Honorable Supreme Court of the United States, despite the Lower Tribunal Court’s actions. : 4. Should this Petitioner’s Motion to Alter and/or Amend been granted ?

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-04-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 17, 2019)

Attorneys

Gustavo Gomez
Gustavo Gomez — Petitioner
Gustavo Gomez — Petitioner