Does the term 'Back' as used in the Award of June 01,1982 include petitioner's neck?

questions presented they are as follows: 1. Does the term Back as used in the Award of June 01,1982 include petitioners neck_ . (a). | Was the ruling of the WCAB (Board ‘s) On, Nov. 2,2017, denying . appellants petition for reconsideration, of Sept. 15, 2017. affirming Finding of fact . of Judge Marshall, dated Sept. 12,2017, that Order by WCJ Joel Gray of 06/01/1982 award, did not include his neck as a body part injured in his 03/12/1981 industrial injury? (App.D. pg16. (a & b)). In direct conflict with the Permanent Disability Rating code .used in listing ; which parts of petitioners body injured in his 03/12/1981 accident. In April 28,1982 rating code 18.1 . (App. F.pg 18 .(a) (b) Does the permanent disability rating code 18.1. used to identify one of petitioners . petitioners injured body parts as, neck, spine , and pelvis. For his 03/12/1981 : injury, and used in April 28,1982. rating, and referred to in the award of 06/01/1982. as Back ,the same as , defined by Donald Gray’s Pocket Atlas of Anatomy..App pgl (c). Is the Term Back used by WCJ Joel Gray, and as defined as Back in . Donald Grays Pocket Atlas of Anatomy of Human as the posterior part of the trunk, from the Neck to pelvis. (does the word back as used . (App. H_pg 20 (a) ) in the award of 06/01/1982 include petitioners; neck spine and pelvis ? and Rating / Code 18. listing neck, spine, and pelvis in its’ 04/28/1982 ratings which was used by WCJ Joel Gray in his Orders of June 01,1982 & January 26, 1984 ( does back mean back ) Or does Back mean low back as claimed by State Compensation Insurance Fun (A I pg.21 (a¢) 2. Was petitioners’ Petition Writ of Review filed, Dec. 22,2017 , protected by CCP 1013 (a)? il ‘ , (a) Whereas WCAB’S notice denying appellants petition for reconsideration was mailed Nov.02,2017, (App. C pg 15 (a) ) (b) CCP.1013(a): states, “ the time to respond shall add five days to all notices or other papers as prescribe by statute or rule of court, is mailed . “ 3. Does the Order of the United States Court of Appeal for The Ninth Circuit Affirming the District ‘s Judgment,_Violate Petitioners’ rights that are guaranteed him in_the 5" and 14" Amendments to the U. S. Constitution to Due Process of Law?_