No. 18-9339

Anthony Dajuan Yates v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2019-05-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: batson batson-challenge batson-v-kentucky criminal-procedure disparate-impact equal-protection juror-selection jury-selection peremptory-challenge peremptory-challenges race-neutral-explanation racial-profiling
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a prosecutor's peremptory challenge of a prospective African-American juror based on the juror's perception of racial profiling by law enforcement in his community, or on his efforts to reduce that racial profiling, constitute a 'race-neutral' explanation for striking the juror, or does it violate the equal protection rights of the juror and of the African-American defendant?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED I. Does a prosecutor’s peremptory challenge ofa prospective African-American juror based on the juror ’s perception of racial profiling by law enforcement in his community, or on his efforts to reduce that racial profiling, constitute a “raceneutral” explanation for striking the juror, or does it violate the equal protection rights of the juror and of the African-American defendant? II. Doesa prosecutor’s peremptory challenge based on negative encounters with law enforcement, particularly those involving racial profiling, violate the Equal Protection Clause because it will inevitably have a disparate impact on prospective minority jurors? 1

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-05-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 19, 2019)

Attorneys

Anthony Yates
Paul Richard KlevenLAW OFFICE OF PAUL KLEVEN, Petitioner
Paul Richard KlevenLAW OFFICE OF PAUL KLEVEN, Petitioner