Whether the residual clause in 18 U.S.C. §924(c)(3)(B) is void for vagueness

No question identified. : QUESTIONS(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether the residual clause in 18 U.S.C. §924(c)(3)(B) is void for vagueness in light of this Court's decisions in Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2251 (2015), and Sessions v. Dimaya, 138 S. Ct. 1204 (2018), a question that has created a split in the court of appeals. 2. Whether Congress Clarification in Section 403 of the First Step Act of 2018, regarding the definition of 18 U.S.C. §924(c)(1)(C), should be deemed to be retroactively applicable to defendants sentenced prior to the Act's clarification where their sentences were impermissibly enhanced. -i