No. 18-937
Abelino Manriquez v. Ralph Diaz, Acting Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Tags: actual-bias capital-case capital-punishment fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus implied-bias juror-bias jury-impartiality life-experiences sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment
Latest Conference:
2019-05-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)
What test determines whether a juror's life experiences are so similar to facts in the case that the juror must be disqualified for bias under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented is: What test determines whether a juror’s life experiences are so similar to facts in the case that the juror must be disqualified for bias under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments?
Docket Entries
2019-05-28
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.
2019-05-02
Reply of petitioner Abelino Manriquez filed.
2019-04-24
Proof of service with respect to brief in opposition filed.
2019-04-19
Brief of respondent Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation in opposition filed.
2019-02-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 19, 2019
2019-02-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 19, 2019 to April 19, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-01-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 19, 2019)
Attorneys
Abelino Manriquez
Sujal J. Shah — Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, Petitioner
Sujal J. Shah — Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, Petitioner
Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Kimara A. Aarons — Respondent
Kimara A. Aarons — Respondent