No. 18-9370
Mark A. Blankenship v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction criminal-procedure district-court district-court-determination fed-r-crim-p-35(b) federal-rules-criminal-procedure federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure judicial-review reduced-sentence sentence-reduction sentencing sentencing-factor sentencing-factors
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does appellate jurisdiction lie from a district court's determination that a particular sentencing factor is relevant to the imposition of a reduced sentence under Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b)?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does appellate jurisdiction lie from a district court’s determination that a particular sentencing factor is relevant to the imposition of a reduced sentence under Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b)?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-05-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 20, 2019)
Attorneys
Mark Blankenship
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent