No. 18-9385
Cargil Nicholson v. Rollin Cook, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Correction
IFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-review certification-of-appeal criminal-procedure discretionary-review due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel trial-counsel
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Connecticut Supreme Court erred by denying the petitioner certification to appeal from the Appellate Court?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED A. WHETHER THE CONNECTICUT SUPREME COURT ERRED BY DENYING. THE PETITIONER CERTIFICATION TO APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE COURT? B. WHETHER THE CONNECTICUT APPELLATE COURT ERRED BY AFFIRMING , THE HABEAS COURT'S FINDING THAT TRIAL COUNSEL'S PERFORMANCE WAS NOT DEFICIENT? . C. WHETHER THE CONNECTICUT APPELLATE COURT ERRED BY FINDING THAT THE HABEAS COURT'S DECISION NOT TO REVIEW RELEVANT PORTIONS OF THE TRANSCRIPTS OF THE UNDERLYING CRIMINAL TRIAL WAS NOT AN. ABUSE OF DISCRETION? oe : i , , oe . _
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-05-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 24, 2019)