Whether the 2nd Circuit Court erred in refusing Petitioner's motion for assistance of counsel and an extension of time under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA/ADAAA)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Connecticut has long been known to be a hotbed of white-collar crime and corruption and countless poor citizens and legitimate heirs have been cheated out of legal inheritances through “Inheritance Hijacking” schemes. Petitioner, a victim of white-collar crime, has been left to die on the streets homeless, raising the following question: Whether the 2™4 Circuit Court erred in refusing Petitioner's motion for ___ assistance of counsel and an extension.-of time under the Americans with © ~~ an Disabilities Act (ADA/ADAAA) when the court knew the Petitioner was not only homeless, but permanently disabled, chronically-ill, elderly, and left seriously injured after a forced-eviction from her own inheritance property and Ancestral Family Home in downtown Meriden, Connecticut? Whether in such life-or-death situations, there is a Constitutional right to “Civil Gideon” appointment of counsel in Connecticut for legal protections in such a dire civil case? 2. Disabled Petitioner 6 generation heiress was sentenced to a “sure death” by being forced into homelessness after a forced-eviction from her own inheritance property. Now, unaided, seriously injured, permanently disabled, chronically-ill, elderly, and denied ADA accommodations by Connecticut emergency shelters, she has been forced to live in a tiny camper shell 4 x 3’ x 6) in her 33 year old, leaky truck, for almost 5 years while this case makes its way through the court system. Whether these inhumane living conditions are gross 8 Amendment violations of current standards of living and decency — dehumanizing, dangerous, and basic human rights and constitutional violations? 3. Whether a legitimate heir-of-the-blood — with a protected Constitutional right of inheritance (when the property in question is legally owned but the lower courts refuse to acknowledge such property inheritance rights) can be subjected to criminal proceedings in the State court for “criminal trespassing” and “criminal burglary” of her own inheritance property? Whether violations of the Speedy Trial Clause of the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution have occurred especially in light that a speedy trial was legally demanded, but the set jury trial date in state court was scheduled for December 31, 2030 — one month, 5 days, and 14 YEARS after the date of forced-eviction and date of filing of the malicious criminal charges thereby denying Petitioner trial vindication rights by a jury of her peers? 4. Whether there is an unconstitutional legal disparity of “equal protection under the law” under the 14% Amendment when states like New York have Pro Se Litigation : Centers where Pro Se litigants have access to an attorney and free legal advice for their federal civil cases but Connecticut and other states have no such similar legal assistance and are denied needed legal help in dire life-or-death civil cases? 5. Where are Petitioner’s inheritance property rights legally protected and enforced? i,