Is 28 U.S.C. § 1915 unconstitutional, discriminatory, based on a person's ability to pay fees and costs and/or to give security for fees and costs for a person who is under U.S. Constitution Amendment V. and not a prisoner?

Questions Presented 1. Is 28 U.S.C. § 1915 unconstitutional, discriminatory, based on a person’s ability to pay fees and costs and/or to give security for fees and costs for a person who is under U.S. Constitution Amendment V. and not a prisoner? 2. If 28 U.S.C. § 1915 as a standard of review is unconstitutional for all persons under U.S. Constitution Amendment V. who cannot pay fees and costs of federal question civil actions, what . is the constitutional standard of review for those persons who , are not prisoners? . 3. If a federal question civil action is able to proceed under law(expanded, new, or existing law) for those under US. Constitution Amendment V. who cannot pay fees and costs and who are not prisoners...for the people of the United States with regard to housing, a roof over the people’s head, can this Court grant explicit US. Constitutional Fourth Amendment punitive damages award to those who lose their right to be secure in their houses against unreasonable seizure because no one issued an Amendment IV. Warrant?