Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals erred in holding that Mr. Long was not entitled to a stay because of inexcusable delay in bringing his lethal-injection-claims

QUESTIONS PRESENTED QUESTION I WHETHER THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERRED IN HOLDING THAT MR. LONG WAS NOT ENTITLED TO A STAY BECAUSE OF INEXCUSABLE DELAY IN BRINGING HIS LETHAL INJECTION CLAIMS? QUESTION II WHETHER THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERRED IN HOLDING THAT MR. LONG WAS PRECLUDED BY RES JUDICATA FROM PURSUING A SECTION 1983 CLAIM THAT FLORIDA’S CURRENT LETHAL INJECTION PROTOCOL (ETOMIDATE PROTOCOL) VIOLATES THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT CLAUSE? i