Whether a state trial court's jury instruction that reduces the burden of proof or violates a principle of fairness contained in the due process clause

No question identified. : sas . c . aursirants) PRESENTED mu i" inte teat COURT INSTRUCT A JURY Bur INSTRUCTION THAT REDUCES THE DEN OF PRoOE oR VIOLATE A PRINCIPLE OF FRIRNESS CONTAINED IN THE DUE PROCESS clause’ 4p , CAN A STATE TRIAL COURT PROHIBIT THE DEFENSE From PRESENT ae FAVOPABLE EVIDENCE (ToxieoL0ay EV\DENUS (RESULTS) THAT THE VICTIM (Aveo Prey IN fie snes wey AS UNDEIL THE INFLUENCE (0F 2 Types oF DRUGS pd HLCOHOL) WHEN HE wes SHOT py HED OY tHE CLIMIWAL DEPENDANT $ THE SIME peMAn ged PetiTNER-To oA SEURDEFENSE DR BE VENUED THE OPPOETUP TTY TP PLESENT THIS © AELEVENT AND CLCA YE RORAE DEFENSE OIDENCE ap TAG Duby. HE VICTIM NAVER perysicacly ATACE pcirtiontot, Soe DID NOT WAsT TO CLAW SEL DEFENSE. vic ONL] waned THE JuPy TD vow wily HE BECAME APERID pe nim AND OLCUDE) to AM HIMSEUE with QUA BUT PHILE DRUNK AND BCUAALEN | (RED THE OTS WITHOUT INTENT BKID