Charlie Russell Martin v. Arizona
Did the knowing use of false testimony at defendant's second trial rise to a denial of due process that likely affected the jury's judgment?
QUESTIONS) PRESENTED 1, Did the Knowing use of False testimony at defendants second trial raise to adenial of due process Hnat Vibely atfected the . jury's judgment? 2. Bid the false, predetermined, non-random lot drawing & alkernate jurors at deferdants second terial violste fundamental fairness under the due process clause ° "3. Was the use of defendants involuntary, coerced pretrial stotements without the benefit of Miranda warnings a vielation of defendants EA Amendment Fidnta ? LL, Was counsels failure on appeal to present nonfrivolous issues a denial of defendants Sith Amendment eight: 4°