No. 18-9400

Charlie Russell Martin v. Arizona

Lower Court: Arizona
Docketed: 2019-05-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 5th-amendment constitutional-rights due-process evidence-admission false-testimony fundamental-fairness ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review jury legal-standard miranda-warnings procedural-due-process state-procedure trial
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the knowing use of false testimony at defendant's second trial rise to a denial of due process that likely affected the jury's judgment?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS) PRESENTED 1, Did the Knowing use of False testimony at defendants second trial raise to adenial of due process Hnat Vibely atfected the . jury's judgment? 2. Bid the false, predetermined, non-random lot drawing & alkernate jurors at deferdants second terial violste fundamental fairness under the due process clause ° "3. Was the use of defendants involuntary, coerced pretrial stotements without the benefit of Miranda warnings a vielation of defendants EA Amendment Fidnta ? LL, Was counsels failure on appeal to present nonfrivolous issues a denial of defendants Sith Amendment eight: 4°

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-05-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 24, 2019)

Attorneys

Charlie Martin
Charlie Russell Martin — Petitioner