No. 18-9401

Daniel H. Jones v. Kentucky, et al.

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-jurisdiction appellate-review civil-procedure clearly-erroneous-findings injunctive-relief judicial-discretion jurisdictional-review legal-standards procedural-error sovereign-immunity wrong-legal-standards
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-11-15 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals err in allowing the District Court to abuse its discretion

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW : i DID THE U.S. SIXTH CIRCUIT COURT . OF APPEALS ERR IN ALLOWING THE . [U.S.] DISTRICT COURT TO ABUSE ITS DISCRETION WHEN RELYING ON CLEARLY ERRONEOUS FINDINGS OF FACT AS WELL AS TO APPLY THE WRONG LEGAL STANDARDS LEADING TO A CLEAR ERROR IN JUDGMENT? | Ht, : DID THE LOWER APPELLATE COURT : : INTERVENE WITH ACTS OF CONGRESS AS WELL AS DECISIONS OF THIS U.S. SUPREME COURT INVOLVING AN ISSUE . OF INJUNCTIVE RELIEF WHICH BARS . SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY? I. ARE THE U.S. APPELLATE COURTS VESTED WITH UNLIMITED POWER IN RESTORING AN ACCUSED TO HIS/HER RIGHT TO BE HEARD IN _. A STATE CIRCUIT OF PROPER JURISDICTION . & VENUE? 11

Docket Entries

2019-11-18
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-10-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-10-14
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-05-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 24, 2019)

Attorneys

Daniel Jones
Daniel Henderson Jones — Petitioner