No. 18-9414

Donald Stewart Royce v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2019-05-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 6th-amendment confrontation-clause criminal-procedure cross-examination due-process evidence impeachment law-enforcement witness witness-testimony
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a trial court abuses its discretion, within the confines of procedural due process in the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment, by limiting cross-examination by the defendant, of the state's witness, about prior out of court statement to law enforcement?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED During the Petitioner’s trial one of the two victims was to be questioned by the defense about prior inconsistent statements to law enforcement for impeachment of her trial testimony, however, the trial court refused to allow this cross examination. Defense ‘counsel had planned to rely on the prior out of court remarks to law enforcement, at the scene, to build upon Petitioner’s defense and the trial court’s ruling on the State’s objection unexpectedly derailed an essential portion of his defense. “Whether a trial court abuses its discretion, within the ‘ confines of procedural due process in the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment, by limiting cross-examination by the defendant, of the State’s witness, about prior out of court . statement to law enforcement ?” : ; ii y \ &

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-23
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-04-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 24, 2019)

Attorneys

Donald Stewart Royce
Donald Stewart Royce — Petitioner
Florida
Carla Suzanne BechardOffice of the Attorney General, State of Florida, Respondent